Comparison

When comparing UI Bakery and Retool for operating in-house data and creating dashboards with charts, both platforms offer strong capabilities but have some key differences. Let’s examine how they compare in these specific areas: Data Handling and Integration Retool Retool excels in data handling and integration, making it a strong choice for operating in-house data[1][4]. It offers: Powerful integration with external data sources, including APIs, databases, and cloud services Support for SQL/NoSQL databases and services like Firebase, MongoDB, and PostgreSQL Real-time data syncing between the UI and data sources UI Bakery ...

It’s difficult to definitively say one is “better” than the other, as each has its strengths and is suited for different use cases. However, I can provide a comparison of their key features and performance to help you make an informed decision: Performance and Scalability Appwrite consistently outperformed Supabase in stress tests, especially when scaling up to handle more users[1][4]. For example: On a €5/month self-hosted server, Appwrite handled up to 2,000 users per day comfortably, while Supabase struggled with larger loads[1]. On a more powerful €30/month server, Appwrite managed up to 250 simultaneous users, while Supabase hit its limit at only 45 users[1]. In breakpoint tests, Appwrite reached 6,800 virtual users, processing 100,000 requests with an average 3-second response time. Supabase reached its breakpoint at 3,000 virtual users, with 59,000 requests and a 6-second average response time[4]. Ease of Use Appwrite offers a smoother self-hosting experience with fewer restrictions and less setup complexity[1][3]. Supabase can be more challenging to configure in a self-hosted environment and has some features restricted or limited when self-hosted[1][3]. Features Both platforms offer similar core features, including authentication, databases, storage, and serverless functions. However, there are some differences: ...