AppWrite vs. Supabase: A Comprehensive Comparison for 2024

In this in-depth analysis, we’ll explore the key differences between AppWrite and Supabase, two leading Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms, to help you make an informed decision for your project needs.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Database: AppWrite leverages MariaDB, while Supabase is built on PostgreSQL
  • Hosting Options: Both platforms provide cloud and self-hosted deployment options
  • Language Support: AppWrite offers extensive support for 10+ languages, while Supabase specializes in TypeScript
  • Performance: AppWrite demonstrates superior performance in stress testing
  • Pricing Model: Both platforms feature free tiers with flexible scaling options

Performance and Scalability Benchmarks

Our comprehensive performance analysis reveals notable distinctions:

Self-Hosted Performance (€5/month Server)

  • AppWrite: Efficiently manages 2,000+ daily users
  • Supabase: Experiences performance constraints at higher user volumes

Enterprise-Grade Performance (€30/month Server)

  • AppWrite: Successfully handles 250 concurrent users
  • Supabase: Reaches capacity at 45 simultaneous users

Stress Test Results

  • AppWrite:
    • Peak: 6,800 virtual users
    • Request handling: 100,000
    • Average response time: 3 seconds
  • Supabase:
    • Peak: 3,000 virtual users
    • Request handling: 59,000
    • Average response time: 6 seconds

Feature Comparison

Core Features

Both platforms deliver essential backend services:

  • Authentication
  • Database management
  • File storage
  • Serverless functions
  • Real-time capabilities

Unique Features

AppWrite Advantages

  • Multi-language support for serverless functions
  • Integrated messaging system (SMS, email, push notifications)
  • Flexible self-hosting options
  • Enhanced resource efficiency

Supabase Advantages

  • Native PostgreSQL support
  • Advanced SQL capabilities
  • Optimized cloud performance
  • Comprehensive database features

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Self-Hosted Setup

  • AppWrite shows superior resource utilization
  • Reduced operational costs for comparable workloads
  • Improved performance-to-cost ratio

Cloud Hosting

  • Both platforms maintain competitive pricing
  • Supabase excels in cloud-native functionality
  • AppWrite offers flexible scaling solutions

Making Your Choice

Choose AppWrite If You Need:

  1. Maximum performance and scalability
  2. Cost-effective self-hosting
  3. Support for multiple programming languages
  4. Integrated messaging capabilities
  5. Streamlined setup and maintenance

Choose Supabase If You Need:

  1. PostgreSQL-specific features
  2. Cloud-optimized infrastructure
  3. Advanced SQL capabilities
  4. Strong TypeScript integration
  5. Managed cloud service

My Personal Choice

For my upcoming project, I’ve selected Supabase based on:

  1. PostgreSQL database requirements
  2. Preference for cloud-hosted solutions
  3. Positive feedback from colleagues
  4. Strong TypeScript integration

I’ll be sharing my Supabase implementation journey in future posts, highlighting practical challenges and solutions.

References

  1. Codigee - AppWrite vs Supabase Comparison
  2. AppWrite Official Comparison
  3. NextBuild Platform Analysis
  4. Cloud vs Self-Hosted Performance Study
  5. Restack Documentation